Loading…
All articles
account20 Oct 2026

MPERS Is Changing. Is Your Sdn Bhd Ready for 2027?

Illustration for MPERS Is Changing. Is Your Sdn Bhd Ready for 2027?

01An Overview of MPERS 2025


The Malaysian Accounting Standards Board (MASB) has issued MPERS (2025), the most extensive revision of the Malaysian Private Entities Reporting Standard since its introduction. The revised standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027.

For many private entities, MPERS has long been regarded as a stable framework requiring little year to year attention. That assumption no longer holds. The revisions affect the recognition of revenue, the measurement of financial instruments, the accounting for acquisitions and the preparation of group financial statements.

Because the new requirements apply retrospectively, the financial year ending in 2026 is likely to form the comparative period. Preparers, directors and finance teams should therefore begin their impact assessment now.

02Key takeaways

  • MPERS (2025) was issued on 10 October 2025 and replaces MPERS (2016).
  • It is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, with early application permitted.
  • Six sections carry the most significant changes, led by a new revenue model aligned with IFRS 15.
  • Changes may affect reported profit, key ratios and loan covenants, not only disclosures.

03Background and effective date

MASB issued MPERS (2025) on 10 October 2025. An entity shall apply it for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027. For an entity with a 31 December year end, the first financial statements prepared under the revised standard will be those for the year ending 31 December 2027. Earlier application is permitted.

The revised standard is based on the third edition of the IFRS for SMEs Accounting Standard, published by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on 27 February 2025. MASB has adopted the IASB text in full, except for scope, applicability and nomenclature. MPERS therefore continues to apply to private entities as defined within the Malaysian regulatory framework.

MASB has described the revision as an update to nearly all sections of the standard. In line with the IASB's objective, the revision brings the standard closer to full IFRS Accounting Standards while retaining simplifications appropriate for smaller entities.

04Key changes

MASB has identified six sections in which the most significant changes arise.

1. Section 23 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Previously titled Revenue, Section 23 is aligned with IFRS 15 through a simplified five-step model. As a consequence, the specific guidance on property development activities in Section 34 is no longer required. Entities with multi-element arrangements, long-term contracts, subscriptions or property development activities are expected to be most affected.

2. Section 12 Fair Value Measurement (new). Fair value requirements previously dispersed across the standard are consolidated into a single section based on IFRS 13. The section introduces the fair value hierarchy and related disclosures. Entities holding investment property, biological assets or investments measured at fair value should assess the impact.

3. Section 11 Financial Instruments. Former Sections 11 and 12 are combined and selectively aligned with IFRS 9. The option to apply IAS 39 is removed. The incurred loss model for impairment is retained, and a maturity analysis for financial liabilities is introduced. Entities with borrowings, intercompany and related party balances, financial guarantees or derivatives should review their classification and disclosures.

4. Section 19 Business Combinations and Goodwill. The section is aligned with IFRS 3 (2008). Acquisition-related costs are expensed, contingent consideration is measured at fair value where reliable measurement is possible without undue cost or effort, and new requirements apply to step acquisitions.

5. Section 9 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The definition of control is aligned with IFRS 10, while the rebuttable presumption of control through majority voting rights is retained. On loss of control, any retained interest is remeasured at fair value, with the resulting gain or loss recognised in profit or loss.

6. Section 2 Concepts and Pervasive Principles. The section is updated to reflect the 2018 Conceptual Framework. The "undue cost or effort" exemption is retained.

Other amendments. These include new disclosures on supplier finance arrangements, a reconciliation of liabilities arising from financing activities, and guidance on assessing currency exchangeability.

Matters not yet addressed. Lease accounting is unchanged. The IASB has deferred alignment with IFRS 16 to its next comprehensive review.

05Business implications

The effects of MPERS (2025) extend beyond the finance function. Directors should consider the following areas.

Timing of revenue and profit. The five-step model requires entities to identify each distinct performance obligation in a contract and recognise revenue as each is satisfied. Where goods and services are sold under a single price, for example equipment with a multi-year service arrangement, a portion of the consideration may be deferred as a contract liability. Reported revenue and profit may shift between periods even where total contract value is unchanged.

Property development. With the removal of the Section 34 guidance, developers will need to determine, contract by contract, whether revenue is recognised over time or at a point in time under Section 23.

Financing arrangements and covenants. Many facility agreements test gearing, interest cover or minimum profit thresholds based on reported figures. Changes in the timing of revenue, or in the measurement of financial instruments, may affect covenant headroom. Early engagement with lenders is advisable.

Mergers and acquisitions. As acquisition-related costs are expensed under the revised Section 19, transaction costs will reduce profit in the period of acquisition rather than form part of goodwill.

Tax considerations. Accounting profit is the starting point for the tax computation, but changes in accounting treatment do not automatically determine the tax treatment. Each transition adjustment and each change in recognition timing should be assessed against the Income Tax Act 1967 and relevant LHDN guidance.

Systems, processes and contracts. Applying the revenue model requires contract-level information that existing billing and reporting systems may not capture. Sales contract templates, month end procedures and internal controls may require revision.

06Transition

The new and amended requirements are applied retrospectively. In the absence of relief, comparative information for the preceding period would be restated in the first financial statements prepared under MPERS (2025). For a 31 December year end entity, this means financial information for 2026 is directly relevant to the transition.

Transition relief is available for the new or amended Sections 9, 11, 12, 19 and 23. For revenue, an entity may continue to apply its existing accounting policy to contracts in progress at the date of initial application. Entities should confirm the precise scope of each relief against the standard before relying on it.

07Recommended next steps

  1. Perform a high-level impact assessment across the six key sections.
  2. Analyse significant revenue contracts to identify distinct performance obligations.
  3. Identify planned acquisitions, changes in ownership interests or potential loss of control in 2026 and 2027.
  4. Review the classification and disclosure of financial instruments, including intercompany balances and guarantees.
  5. Inventory all assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
  6. Quantify the indicative effect on 2026 results and key ratios.
  7. Engage with lenders on covenant definitions and with auditors on the transition approach.

08Sources and notes

This article is general educational content and is not advice on your specific circumstances. Speak to your auditor or tax agent before acting.

— KTP’s View

MPERS (2025) should not be viewed as a technical update for the auditor alone. The revisions change how an entity's performance and financial position are presented, with consequences for financing, transactions and governance.

Entities that begin their assessment in 2026 will be better placed to manage the transition in an orderly way, to communicate changes to lenders and stakeholders in advance, and to avoid costly remediation at the first reporting date.

A proportionate response is appropriate. For most private entities, a review of the most significant revenue contracts will provide a reliable early indication of the scale of change and the areas that warrant further work.

— Visit Us

Come say hello.

Two firms in the heart of Taman Molek, Johor Bahru.

KTP

KTP & Company PLT

Wisma KTP, 53, 53-01 & 53-02, Jalan Molek 1/8, Taman Molek, 81100 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
THK

THK Management Advisory

Wisma THK, No. 41, 41-01, 41-02, Jalan Molek 1/8, Taman Molek, 81100 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.
— SOCIALS

Stay connected.

KTP
KTP Career
KTP Lifestyle
THK